|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:38 am
being an environmental earth scientist i have strong views on this topic. i can quite happily say that i know pretty much all there is to know on the topic and am happy to hear your views and questions. this is a growing issue and sooner rather than later the bush administration will have to accept this ever growing threat!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:43 am
It's not mainly human caused. Saying humans and THE BURNING OF FOSSIL FUELS are causing global warming is like saying dropping a small rock in the Atlantic Ocean caused a tsunami. Just an overexxageration and a bit of human ego.
And why the Bush administration? Global warming ******** EVERYONE. Not just America.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:19 am
there is too much evidence that sujests that we are the cause! such as a rise in CO2 in the upper atmosphere since the begining of the industrial revolution. studying the carbon cycle has shown that the reason that our atmosphere isn't toxic to life is due to the prehistoric plants taking that CO2 out of the atmosphere and beoming lithifighed as fossil fuels. this harmful gas is being released again into the atmosphere by human activity and dening this is one step closer to our demise! not only our we burning fossil fuels but we are cutting down trees (a natural carbon sink) and the melting of icecaps is releasing CO2 traped in ice bubbles. we are having an impact whether small or great and it's a threat that needs to be addressed. there is always the possibility that it is a part of the natural cycle of the earth, ice cores from the north pole have shown us that there have been meny peeks and troffs of carbon in the atmosphere. mainly due to past volcanic activity and the likes.
as for your last statement. exactly my point. the bush administration refuse to acnolage there is even a problem. being the leaders of CO2 pollution in the world, the squeaze out more gas than Europe combined. it's just foolish to say we're not affecting the atmosphere at all yet time and time again the American government refuses to sign the kyoto protocal in favor of low fuel prices and greater profit for thier country. so i ask you: "what good is money if you dont have a world to spend it on?"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:51 am
I am forced to agree With Kymura on this point. The way I see it, Humanity has grown scientifically faster then we have socially. Yes, we have the technology to make all sorts of nifty things, movies, Transformers go-bots, Soft drinks and computers, but could anyone truely look me in the ey with a straight face and say if we, as a world, continue at this rate of consumtion and pollution, that the world will just be..worthless? Proof: I'm not saying recycling is the awnser, It does use enormes amounts of fossil fuels and it isnt that effciant, but thier are a few simple, almost logical things we can do to fix things.
Take soler power: Comman reason says this is a brilliant idea. harvesting energy from a source that is practically renewable? We cannot use up all of the suns energy, thats not how it works. Hell, it saves money! tose things end up paying for them selves (regarding personal Solar cells and collecters)
I know someone will probaly talk about the econmy, but its not like we take the money we save from oil/natruel gas/electricity and throw it in the toilet, it still goes into the economy, just diffrently.
Jacko; Seriously man, its science. Nice save on americas behalf, though. Ill be ******** if Ill take the blame alone. America is not the only superpower that uses fossil fuesl.
Q.E.D.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:51 am
zerox. though you have the right idea your so called proof is flawed. your correct about recycling, though we shouldent really be looking towards recycling to solve all our problems, reusing on the other hand, thats a step in the right direction, rather than spend energy and money on melting down a glass bottle to turn it into another glass bottle we should just reuse it! now thats logic. as for solar power being the answer to the world energy crisis, a saviour to all our atmospheric problems, i think you need to stand back and look at the facts. solar power generates a very limited amount of energy (and thats when the sun is up) so inorder to produce enough energy to power your home you'd need a sizable area that would only give power for 50% of the day. less power in the winter(when it's needed most). no effective way of storing it. the development of the tecnology is still only in it's early stages and thus isnt very effective and is very expencive. for the amount of energy it produces it have every little apliction in industry. and if it did we'd be talking hectars of land devoted to generation of power which would devalue the land and cause a huge impact on the environment! for demestic use, yes it would be a good idea but we're lating a while before it becomes good enough to take on even the smaller competitors in renewable fuel. as for your next points the economy of America is it's only concern, cutting back on it is imposible, but it should be looking at cutting back on it's emisions vaia taxation and subsidies for so called 'green' companies. all it needs to do is make 'GREEN' more apealing! America isnt the only 'superpower' that uses fossil fuels but it is the leading polluter in a world of countries that are now cutting down. how long and America stick its fingers in it's ears singing "LaLaLa im not lisenting"?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:41 am
Micheal Crichton is an Intelligient author who loves to write fiction, but he is also very concerned with the world, so he did lots of research into global warming. What he found was astounding! So he presented the truth of it to the puiblic through a great book called "State of Fear" he tells you where he got his information in footnotes at the bottom of pages, and all of them are true! He clearly shows you how much of a sham all of thisa crap is!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:50 am
We've ******** the earth over royally, and no one really cared up untill a few years ago....
Honestly, I'm glad I won't be around for when things get really bad...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:54 pm
Gunner_Nexus We've ******** the earth over royally, and no one really cared up untill a few years ago.... Honestly, I'm glad I won't be around for when things get really bad... ...You might. That's the problem - everyone thinks it's still far, far in the future so they just ignore it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:07 pm
Happy-Kindness Micheal Crichton is an Intelligient author who loves to write fiction, but he is also very concerned with the world, so he did lots of research into global warming. What he found was astounding! So he presented the truth of it to the puiblic through a great book called "State of Fear" he tells you where he got his information in footnotes at the bottom of pages, and all of them are true! He clearly shows you how much of a sham all of thisa crap is! He used footnotes in a quasi academic text? Wow! You certainly don't see that every day! Though your post is barely comprehensible I'm pretty sure you're saying that global warming is a fraud. I suggest you go and look in the science or current events sections of your local bookstore for anything about global warming, I personally would suggest Tim Flannery's 'The Weathermakers' though I'm not sure if it's available outside Australia. You'll find that they have footnotes too! And many of them are written by actual scientists who are too busy doing real research to 'love writing fiction'.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:31 pm
The greatest public health crisis is in the planet's environmental sustainability and creation of environmental conditions that could breed an irreversible disaster. In service to mining, energy, timber, coal, and other industries that helped finance President Bush's elections, the Bush administration systematically seeks to unravel environmental protections on everything from wetlands and national forests and national parks to the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts.
The current corporate regime, beyond the Bush-Cheney administration, is dominated by the auto, oil, and broader petrochemical complex, making its profits a core imperative of all policy. This is manifested most clearly in the administration's failure to sign the Kyoto Protocol controlling global carbon emissions, or even to acknowledge that global warming is an established scientific fact.
For a litany of the steps taken by the Bush administration to unravel environmental protection, see the Sierra Club, 2004. "The Bush Record: More Than 300 Crimes against Nature," www.sierraclub.org/sierra/200409/bush_record_print.asp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:11 pm
I agree. People need to wake up and face the problem.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|