i commend you on a post that questions conventional thinking and hope to see more from you but there are some issues with your argument which i would like to point out in a constructive manner.
First i would like to let you know that
Wikipedia has articles on just about everything and if you had researched your topic you might have seen what i suspected right away, that your concept of The Forms is little off. by misunderstanding your premise your whole argument is invalid. i read the first three pages of this article
Theory of Forms/wiki and saw in clear terms the unraveling of your argument; "Theory of Forms[1] asserts that Forms, and not the material world of change known to us through sensation, possess the highest and most fundamental kind of reality." that is to say that the Forms are not a part of physical reality but lie behind it as hidden factors also; "A Form is aspatial (outside the world) and atemporal (outside time). Atemporal means that it does not exist within any time period. It did not start, there is no duration in time, and it will not end. It is neither eternal in the sense of existing forever or mortal, of limited duration. It exists outside time altogether.[12] Forms are aspatial in that they have no spatial dimensions, and thus no orientation in space, nor do they even (like the point) have a location.[13] They are non-physical, but they are not in the mind. Forms are extra-mental.[14]"
like i said i do not wish to discourage you but help you to work better, i hope to hear more from you, and i might add a link to a lesser known theory that might be related to your subject of inquiry:
Morphic Field good day
Reply
