|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:14 pm
For the most part, I sort of like the Guild Changes. It really helps when Add Requests for Guilds are marked as such so Guild Leaders have an easier time finding them in their inboxes. But the whole change of Vice Presidents can no longer fill the position of Guild Leader unless the original GL is banned or doesn't log in after 60 days. Exactly what is the point of this change? What if the GL/President decides that they no longer have the time to run the guild and want to leave the Vice President in charge? Now with the new change, they can't do that.
What do you guys think?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:25 am
Scarlet Dusk Li Feng But the whole change of Vice Presidents can no longer fill the position of Guild Leader unless the original GL is banned or doesn't log in after 60 days. Exactly what is the point of this change? What if the GL/President decides that they no longer have the time to run the guild and want to leave the Vice President in charge? Now with the new change, they can't do that. What do you guys think?
Yes, I was sort of curious why they did that also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:48 am
This guild was originally owned by my hacked account and the only way I was able to get it back was through the Vice Captain taking control of ownership of the guild.
I do think it's better though because the Vice Captain could get mad or something and then steal the guild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:51 pm
Lmao. I'd have to agree. It's rather annoying, but necissarry I guess?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:34 pm
I don't know much about the guild setup, but I hate how they changed the toolbar so you have to go to the guild homepage first instead of having a direct link to 'my guilds'. Most people don't want the guild homepage on a regular basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
