Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Other: Parties, News Articles and anything that is still political but doesn't fit
Who said d**k Cheney couldn't wreck a nation by himself?

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

DarthNader
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:14 pm


I found this article on Rolling Stone about cheney from before the 2004 election. It really showed me to what extent d**k cheney is an evil b*****d. Here's a few excerpts.

On: how he ruined Gerald ford
Quote:
Ford was caught as flat-footed by the fall of Saigon in April 1975 as Bush was by the September 2001 attacks. A better president, with more astute advisers, might have arranged a more orderly ending to the long and divisive war. But instead of heeding the country's desire for honesty and reconciliation, Rumsfeld and Cheney convinced Ford that the way to turn himself into a real president was to stir up crises in international relations while lurching to the right in domestic politics.

Having turned Ford into their instrument, Rumsfeld and Cheney staged a palace coup. They pushed Ford to fire Defense Secretary James Schlesinger, tell Vice President Nelson Rockefeller to look for another job and remove Henry Kissinger from his post as national security adviser. Rumsfeld was named secretary of defense, and Cheney became chief of staff to the president. The Yale dropout and draft dodger was, at the age of thirty-four, the second-most-powerful man in the White House.

As the 1976 election approached, Rumsfeld and Cheney used the immense powers they had arrogated to themselves to persuade Ford to scuttle the Salt II treaty on nuclear-arms control. The move helped Ford turn back Reagan's challenge for the party's nomination -- but at the cost of ceding the heart of the GOP to the New Right. Then, in the presidential election, Jimmy Carter defeated Ford by 2 million votes.


On his strategy to remain in power:

Quote:
On Capitol Hill, he combined a moderate demeanor with a radical agenda. People who find Cheney's extremism as vice president surprising have not looked at his congressional voting record. In 1986, he was one of only twenty-one members of the House to oppose the Safe Drinking Water Act. He fought efforts to clean up hazardous waste and backed tax breaks for energy corporations. He repeatedly voted against funding for the Veterans Administration. He opposed extending the Civil Rights Act. He opposed the release of Nelson Mandela from jail in South Africa. He even voted for cop-killer bullets.

"I don't believe he is an ideologue," says former Sen. Tim Wirth of Colorado. "But he is the most partisan politician I've ever met." Many weekends, while Congress was in session, Wirth and Cheney would take the same flight to Chicago, where they'd change planes for Colorado and Wyoming. "I spent a lot of time waiting for planes with d**k Cheney," Wirth, a Democrat, says. "He never talked about ideology. He talked about how the Republicans were going to take over the House of Representatives." Wirth adds, "It seemed impossible, but that's exactly what happened."

Cheney knew precisely who should lead the GOP takeover. "d**k and Lynne had their eyes on the speakership," says Professor Fred Holborn of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. "He and Lynne wrote a book on the speakership." As the subtitle of Kings of the Hill indicates, it is about how "powerful men changed the course of American history" through control of the House.

Cheney's strategy for gaining power was the same one he and Rumsfeld had foisted on Ford: making sure no one in the Republican Party outflanked him to the right. This was a deeply divisive approach, because it involved pandering to racial and religious extremists and using complex matters of national security as flag-waving wedge issues. "d**k's votes against civil rights and the environment were parts of complex deals aimed at enhancing his own power," says Barlow, his former supporter.


On how he wrecked Halliburton, and made deals with dictators
Quote:
Halliburton was Cheney's first real chance to get rich; he grabbed it with both hands. His principal action was his acquisition of a subsidiary called Dresser Industries. Dresser struck lucrative deals with Saddam Hussein; Halliburton did business with Muammar el-Qaddafi and the ayatollahs of Iran. By the time Cheney left in 2000, Halliburton's stock was near an all-time high of fifty-four dollars a share. Then it turned out that Dresser had saddled Halliburton with asbestos lawsuits that could cost the company millions, and the stock plummeted to barely ten dollars a share. Even with the bounce Halliburton stock has received from the war, an investor who put $100,000 into the company just before Cheney became vice president would have less than $60,000 today. Cheney, meanwhile, continues to receive $150,000 a year in deferred compensation from Halliburton, even though he is supposed to divest himself of all conflicts of interest. The company has been awarded $8 billion in contracts by the Bush-Cheney administration for its work in Iraq.



And, though relatively inconsequential, the most elaborate draft-dodging ever:
Quote:
He showed no interest, one way or another, in the Vietnam War -- until a Texas president, nearly forty years before George W. Bush, turned a remote foreign struggle into a catastrophic, unwinnable war. Thanks to Lyndon Johnson's escalation of Vietnam, lounging around was suddenly no longer an option. Cheney snapped into action. First he enrolled in Casper Community College; then he went to the University of Wyoming. That kept him out of the draft until August 7th, 1964, when Congress initiated massive conscription in the armed forces. Three weeks later, Cheney married Lynne Vincent, his high school girlfriend, earning him another deferment. Then, on October 26th, 1965, the Selective Service announced that childless married men no longer would be exempted from having to fight for their country. Nine months and two days later, the first of Cheney's two daughters, Elizabeth, was born. All told, between 1963 and 1966, Cheney received five deferments.


wow...what a b*****d
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:14 pm


Hey bud, before you go on your crusade against the republican party, two things.
1) You truly can break down or create the eperceft profile to any public official
2) Wow you honestly think that, d**k Cheny is an evil "b*****d?", 1st of all, look at your pathetic excuse for a candidate. John Kerry, you think he is poor? You are kidding me, do you know how much it costs to run for office? Let alone how much he gets for being a senator? Let alone how horrible he was then. "Save Alaska!" Save alaska my a$$, you know to stop some of the major oil contracts, senate was one vote short of stopping em' who's vote do you think that was? DING DING DING John Kerry strikes again with his half baked ideas. Look up and relize that when d**k Cheny or The Bush Administration says there guna do something, they stick with it, through the good and THE BAD, not beat around the bush.

Drewser
Captain


DarthNader
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:21 pm


Drewser
Hey bud, before you go on your crusade against the republican party, two things.
1) You truly can break down or create the eperceft profile to any public official
2) Irrelevant comparisons to John Kerry, something about claiming John kerry was poor. something about John kerry and Alaska, a lot of bad grammar, forgetting to defend Cheney, making it clear that the article wasnt read, and that I didnt even skim through the excerpts posted here.


Aint that just like the Bushies? when you simply bring upa point which no amount of spinning, lying or denying anyting will put them at the top: JOHN KERRY WAS RICH! AND HE WAS PRO-HOMO!

ah, good times.
I mean, really, at least Pimpkilla would have pulled some false defense out of his a**. You're not even trying

yes, I know John Kerry was rich. in fact, he's the richest man to ever run with the democrats since the split of the democratic republicans in 1822. I'm still looking to see where I accused Cheney of being too rich, or whereI mentioned ANWR, or where I ever said john kerry would be a good president.
Fun fact: the combined wealth of the presidential and vice presidential candidates for the 2004 elections were more than double that of the following three on the list.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:02 pm


You are bringing up facts about the Republican party and how they mearly destroyed America (the country which I will be fighting for HELL YA 2009!) but anyways, I was just showing you that you shouldn't blame any- one person for what has happened, exspecially if some of the blame may be given to less respective members of the legelative branch. You were bringing up points about Cheny, I was showing you a bigger picture of what goes on, not only as what these may or may not have owned, but what they do with the power they are elected with.

Drewser
Captain


Drewser
Captain

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:03 pm


DarthNader

ah, good times.
I mean, really, at least Pimpkilla
.

Dude what the hell?
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:05 am


Drewser
You are bringing up facts about the Republican party and how they mearly destroyed America (the country which I will be fighting for HELL YA 2009!) but anyways, I was just showing you that you shouldn't blame any- one person for what has happened, exspecially if some of the blame may be given to less respective members of the legelative branch. You were bringing up points about Cheny, I was showing you a bigger picture of what goes on, not only as what these may or may not have owned, but what they do with the power they are elected with.

But I didnt say anything about policy or voting record. I showed how d**k Cheney was responsible for the downfall of gerald ford, the last republican in the spirit of Eisenhower, and led to his influence in bth the Bush admininstration, the republicans in the spirit of Nixon.
I didnt even bring up how he voted against the US calling for the release of Nelson mandela from prison, or the safe drinking water act, both surely more damaging than some misguided douchebagger by Kerry. I'm not talking about the role your average legislator has in ******** up history, I'm talking about the driving force in the major political ******** ups of the last 30 years. (ok, not bay of pigs, Iran contra or whitewater).
Point is, its completely innaprorpiate. its like comparing ted stevens to richard Nixon.

DarthNader
Vice Captain


DarthNader
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:28 pm


so...my thread is dead then...
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:00 pm


then i wasted my time reading this just right now didn't I? and what's wrong with homosexuals marrying? Really don't you see the similarities to homosexual marriage and slavery? Europe and Canada abolished slavery before the US and the US had to have a big war with itself to get rid of it. Let's face it we aren't the most progressive country and we don't even try.

SlyPenguin


DarthNader
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:41 pm


SlyPenguin
then i wasted my time reading this just right now didn't I? and what's wrong with homosexuals marrying? Really don't you see the similarities to homosexual marriage and slavery? Europe and Canada abolished slavery before the US and the US had to have a big war with itself to get rid of it. Let's face it we aren't the most progressive country and we don't even try.
...
what..is this in the wrong thread or...
what's going on?
I dont get what gay marriage has to do with anything
Reply
Other: Parties, News Articles and anything that is still political but doesn't fit

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum
//
//

// //

Have an account? Login Now!

//
//