|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elen_Gilthoniel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:41 pm
*rolls around*
Yeah, what the title said--any feedback, tips, complaints, arguments, questions about the character thread in the main forum can go here. =)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:53 pm
I'll start the ball here, then. As an author I still find it remarkable that Mary Sues exist (and RPing with them is like pulling teeth, with tiny, rusty jewellery pliers). I find them to be the most boring characters in existance. There is, for me, no fun in playing a character who is perfect in everything - appearance, mannerisms, power etc.
I'm also perplexed that people have not learned how to be both attached and detached from their characters. I will try and explain what I mean, however it's hard since, for me, it's a rather natural thing.
When I create a character it is because I get a name and a face in my head. Which is usually followed by a lot of personality and history "information dumping" from the character themselves. And, especially when I am writing a novel, I already have planned out what will happen to this character. They might die, they might be maimed, they might suffer a tragedy, or they might push through a past tragedy to a semblence of happiness.
As I write, I do get attached to a character insofar as I feel somewhat bad if I maim then, sad if I kill them off, I laugh if I manage to get them to say something unintentionally hilarious, furious if I find someone stealing them (and I make sure to keep checking wink ) and I am glad when I manage to capture them, however briefly, exactly how I picture them in my mind (afterall, nothing will ever be as pure as the story your iamgine. We begin destryoing a story the moment we write it down). So yes, to an extent, I am attached to my character.
But I am also detatched. My characters will be hurt, depressed, happy, lose people, win people, fail, win, be tortured by others or themselves etc. In roleplays I am never upset when someone else's character hates mine. I find it's just as good for characterisation as characters liking them. In fact, oftentimes, it is better.
Let's take - as ever - my character Cheeva as an example. I've worked for years to get her nicely balanced. Outwardly she's...frankly a snarky, mildly unblanace, b***h. She is anti-social, sharp-tongued, rude, hateful, she kills seemingly without conscience, unfeeling, cold, etc. But, conversely, to those she considers family or friends, she is very maternal, she has her own code of ethics, her own fears (lol water) and insecurities. Physically and "power"-wise, she is actually nowhere near as strong and infalliable as she would like people to think.
And all that is why she is a joy to RP and to write. Some characters she clashes with because her personality does not mesh with said character. So we get great scenes of snark, anger, hissy-fits etc. Other characters she does mesh with and we get to see the side of her that is motherly and protective. Do I get mad if someone's character hates her then? No, of course not, because they are reacting to her personality. Do I get clingy and almost stalker-ish to RPers and characters who like her? No, because that's not in her character (or mine) and is, frankly, really creepy to see happen O.o
Do I feel attached to Cheeva as a character? Yes. Could I kill her off? In a heart beat. It would be sad but, if she had to die...she dies quite frankly.
It's about keeping a healthy distance from your character. If your happiness is bound up in how much people like your character and how they react to them, then you really need to look and see if writing and RP are really healthy for you. You need to really look at why you are trying to live out some perfect, fantastical bubble life through your character. Otherwise you won't be happy and, frankly, no one but other people with this Mary Sue/Gary Stu issue will want to RP/write with you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elen_Gilthoniel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:24 pm
I didn't really address this but after reading what you wrote, I need to point out that people can also get wish fulfillment from tragedy.
It's really easy to fall into the trap of thinking because your character faces (or has faced) tragedy, this shows you being detached but that's not true at all. In some cases, the attention and pity characters get from facing hardships can also be feeding that self indulgence that is really the core issue of Mary Sues.
Either people enjoy the attention their character gets (and they get) from tragic drama or having their character face a hardship and triumph over it serves as that wish fulfillment. But I think what we see with Mary Sues who face tragedy is that they don't have realistic reactions to it or consequences from it.
Either they're way over dramatic or in the end, the tragedy has no real negative impact on them--like they deal with it with perfect grace and understanding without really enduring any of the normal pain associated with whatever event it is. Or they react in a completely over the top, melodramatic way that is really not appropriate. For instance most of the time you don't see Mary Sues getting physically maimed in an overt way (like losing a limb) but when it does happen, it's played in a way that undermines the real tragedy of the event.
Either it's played up for pity too much, or the 'maiming' makes them sexier somehow and the real consequences of the accident are ignored.
I'm not sure if that makes sense really but I think the main problem with Mary Sues is the motivation behind them more than their specific attributes. You can't try to live vicariously through a character and expect that to be a decent character. Ever--not in a story, not in an RP.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:52 pm
Oh, definitely, and tragic Mary Sues were something I was going to bring up but completely forgot. My biggest pet peeve is the "tragic background" that the Sue has somehow suffered through and has come out the other side with absolutely no physical or mental/emotional issues whatsoever.
I'll use Chee again as an example. Her upbringing was chaotic and, frankly, not very nice (I won't go in depth now because it ruins some of her novel and I don't like letting out spoilers lol). But it obviously has an affect on the way she interacts with people, how she sees the world and how she interacts with it. She hasn't come out the other side as a bubbly, hyper-happy, fawning, super perfect adult. She is terribly flawed.
Its the characters who, say, see their entire family killed and have to burn their home and bodies before travelling on - and come out as perfectly adjust adult who loves everyone etc. that bother me. There are no consequences for their past trauma. People make up these attention-seeking, tragic pasts that are meant to garner sympathy from other characters and other RPers...then make the character perfect in every possible way. It isn't at all believeable and it makes a character, again, painful to interact with. Especially if they continually bring it up.
Another thing I absolutely can't stand is when someone bring up that, say, their character has blue eyes in almost every single post. I feel like saying "we get it, they have blue eyes, well done". It's not necessary and it makes it seem like that RPer is saying everyone else is an idiot for not having remembered their character has such-and-such a feature. But that's a discussion for another time, lol.
To get back on topic, I agree, tragedy and tragic pasts, with no conesquences to the character and their characterisation in anyway, is a cheap way of writing and RPing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:52 pm
It took a while to get Aku as he is now. Yes, he seeks romance all the time. He'd love to pair with anybody. But that is not from my own need for romance, nor do I feel fulfilled when he succeeds scoring with someone.
There is a reason he is why he is. He's vain, selfish, and may very well be a sex addict. There are also factors in his past that contribute to this, such as being abandoned like he was. He kidnaps people to fill that need of being wanted, to fill that need of someone being there, whether willing or unwillingly. Sleeping with them, again willingly or unwillingly, is an added bonus that he uses for his own need to know someone in every single way possible.
If he finds someone that peaks his interest, it gets stuck in his head that he /needs/ that person. He will do anything to kidnap them and have them all to himself. He will take care of them, feed them, might even watch them sleep. He will keep them until he gets bored of them, they escape, or he releases them so he won't get caught. He is quite fond of shock collars, too.
He also delights in the suffering as others, and has no sympathy for no one. He lost his sympathy for others when he got abandoned.
However. There are certain people (let's say Saeslin in this case), that he will attach himself to and will become entirely dependent on them, at least mentally. If he disapproves, Aku will try to stop doing what he disapproves, but if he approves, he will strive and get better just to make him happier.
Even so, if you take all that away, Aku isn't that bad of a friend if he doesn't target you. His attitude doesn't mesh well with most others, but he tries to be nice every once in a while. Though, Aku is much more tolerable to be around if he already has someone as a prisoner. He treats his prisoners like he would if they were a very good friend, and will only treat them badly if they act out and misbehave. Though.. he does tend to experiment on them from time to time.
Parts of him will come off as creepy, some as eccentric, but he is a fun character to play as. Despite this, he does have more flaws than perks. I can't tell if he's balanced enough, or if he needs more positive things.
Though, this is speaking for my original Aku, not for any Aku I have played on Gaia. When playing on Gaia, I leave certain parts of him out for fear of him getting too creepy, or too much for Gaia. So far, everywhere I've played him were different in personality when adjusting for his past. The current DS Aku has got to be the nicest Aku I've actually ever played but I still can't tell if he's balanced or not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:20 pm
Yeah, Aku is a pretty flawed creeper. I wouldn't call him a Mary Sue because he lacks the whole idealistic thing. XD I don't know that I would say Aku really seeks 'romance' though--he seeks physical companionship at best and probably just sex really--unless we're dealing with an obsession of his which is something completely different.
It's like Christine--she'd sex nearly anything because she just really likes sex. It has nothing to do with me wanting pairings. That is just who she is.
I don't think there's anything wrong really with being open to pairings and possibly not with seeking them out. But there's a point where you cross the line between wanting a specific pairing and NEEDING a specific pairing because you have an emotional attachment to someone else's character. And you're using your own character to experience what a relationship would be like with that character.
That is...not just Sueing. But it's also sort of creepy. D=
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Elen_Gilthoniel Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:36 pm
XD He does want physical companionship, and mostly sex, but it could technically be called an obsession. At the least, it's on the verge of being one.
Christine is like.. Aku's female counterpart, in that sense only. XD
Though, Aku does tend to seek out pairings a lot, but.. if the owner says they don't want that to happen, I try to control Aku enough to only admire or want to be with the person, but not actually physically do anything. I do try to be careful about it but he does sometimes get attached to one specific character if he's around them for so long.
I agree on that last part. D: Wanting a pairing just for that reason is definitely creepy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:05 am
StrawberryZ0mbie I don't think there's anything wrong really with being open to pairings and possibly not with seeking them out. But there's a point where you cross the line between wanting a specific pairing and NEEDING a specific pairing because you have an emotional attachment to someone else's character. And you're using your own character to experience what a relationship would be like with that character. That is...not just Sueing. But it's also sort of creepy. D= This. I couldn't say it better myself. Because that's...a whole different kind of idealistic fantasy >.>; Like the people who think they will marry that Twilight characters, or Harry Potter, etc. It's all kinds of creepy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:39 pm
Sometimes I tend to be paranoid that any or all of my characters are Mary Sues ^^;
Nearly all my character personalities (at least, the ones that take more than 5 minutes to think up) tend to be taken from my own reactions to certain base emotions. And though I know that Mary Sues aren't always made simply from having any similarities or link to their author, every little thing has me fearing if I'm Mary Suing without knowing it, because I first consult what I would do if I were like that before typing out what my character would do. And with the link I have with my characters, it's simply like replying through a different facet of me.
At the same time though, this is about the only thing my characters and I ever have in common---the base emotion that each character is made from. From there, I build up their personalities by practicing dialogue with each other (like Nery/Itren, Marielle/Delkes in their respective stories were often put into practice conversations to become more comfortable with their character interactions as well as language).
With pairings, I often kind of headdesk a little when I see those RPs that encourage romance confused I mean, there's nothing bad with pairings. But being put that way, it's...you know, encouraged. And sometimes I feel that some RPs are simply places for Mary-Sues and Gary-Sues to gather and fulfill each other. I enjoy how RPs like this one, Lybold, WINGS, Regalia...they have strict rules that make sure the RP is seen more as a collab between serious writers than a place to create a character that you can vicariously live through.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:29 am
I don't think any of your characters are Mary Sues. I think it's normal for people to put themselves into their characters.
I think to really fit as a Mary Sue, the character either has to be too "perfect" (one of those with too many romanticized and idealized traits) or one that is created for wish fulfillment/self indulgence.
And none of your characters are like that at all.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Elen_Gilthoniel Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elen_Gilthoniel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:19 am
It would be great to see more discussion on this--particularly from people who haven't contributed anything yet. =)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:28 am
I always seem to have trouble writing up a history for a character, even a short one. Like for my WIP character, I can't seem to get his history right in my head. I'm also trying to wrap my head around his personality because when I go to describe it, it starts sounding like a character I already have in this RP, so.. it makes me wonder if I should make a different character entirely instead of trying to fix my WIP to a workable, unique-ish character. x-x
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:51 pm
Kuroyanagika I always seem to have trouble writing up a history for a character, even a short one. Like for my WIP character, I can't seem to get his history right in my head. I'm also trying to wrap my head around his personality because when I go to describe it, it starts sounding like a character I already have in this RP, so.. it makes me wonder if I should make a different character entirely instead of trying to fix my WIP to a workable, unique-ish character. x-x Often, I think, with character histories, we seem to get stuck in a few set kinds of history in order to avoid cliches - the orphan, the tragic past, etc. So it can be hard to sit there and think, "is this cliched or not?" I think though, even with character histories, you can work with cliches. If you want to do the tragic past, then have your character and their behaviour and their personality reflect that. I also think history and personaliy are very much inter-linked, which might be why you're having an issue working both out, here. I think, maybe, you might also have gotten into a certain niche with your character personalities, which might be why you feel like they're all the same. Maybe try sitting down and listing the personalities you usually use then...do the opposite? And from there, work out a history that would match that personality (our past, after all, dictates our present). Why don't you post what you have of both the history and personality, here, and we can all help you and use this as a way of learning how to construct a good, workable, history and personality?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:08 pm
I completely agree with Chee about personality and history--these two things are completely intertwined. My personality section is finished so I can post it up but the history one is very started.
I was definitely going to cover this because this is an area where a lot of people need help. Including myself. Sometimes it's hard when you have a character who doesn't have an "interesting" past--For those kinds of characters, who've just lived normal lives, I try to summarize their childhood and then spend more in depth time talking about major decisions in their adult life. Like--if they own a shop, focus on how they got it and why they own it. Things like that.
Not everyone can have the traumatic childhood or very interesting, lively life. Some people really are just normal. Those are the hard ones for me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Elen_Gilthoniel Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:56 am
I think.. with my personalities, I usually tend to do the serious-type, or I try to do crazy/demented type (is some shape or form).
Danae is the first character I've done with a bubbly/ditzy attitude but I did that on purpose because I really do too many serious characters and I needed to somehow break away from that.
Intai, my WIP, on the otherhand, I'm having difficult transitioning his personality with his age. He is an old character of mine but initially he's only a child. I know the limitations of a child in this RP so I'm forcing him to grow up and I've never played him at his current age (21-ish) before. I would think with age, some things change with personality, like naiveté and pure intentions and things like that. I have played him a bit younger, but I think the thought of playing him at 21 is what is messing me up, too.
Initially, as a child, his personality is naive, honest, and a complete brat, but even as a child he's completely biased against certain kinds of women and his nature will change to distrusting and cautious around those certain kinds of women.
For the WIP version, I have the personality still set to distrusting and cautious around certain kinds of women, yet when he's not around those types, he's supposed to be enthusiastic and perhaps a bit cocky, as well as willing to say what's on his mind. Though.. the last half, to me, is starting to sound like Aku, even though I know in my head they're entirely different.
I also know his social status should affect his personality, and he's supposed to be a Royal Wind. So, I'm thinking he does have to be serious when the time calls for it but I don't want him to be the type that's serious all the time. Though.. I think I do also have it that he's reluctant to do his noble responsibilities, but that doesn't stop him from doing them. He just personally doesn't like them and would rather be doing something else, but I'm not sure if that would fit with someone of his social status.
As for his history, there is one event I would like to try and keep, but that can be taken out if I can't get it to work. Which is, basically, the event that caused him to distrust certain types of women. In his WIP thread, I have it that it was one of his nannies that caused this distrust, but.. now that I think about it more, it should be someone that he was closer to, like perhaps his mother or a childhood friend?
I'd like to think a falling out between him and either his mum/friend in a traumatic way would cause him from then on out to distrust/be cautious around women that are similar to them.
However, if I can't get that to work, I'm more than willing to take that out of his history and his personality and try a different approach on this character.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|