|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:49 am
Writing about vampires was always something taboo. There are very few books in the twentieth century written about vampires. Then suddenly, the twenty-first century rolls along. BAM! Books about vampires everywhere you turn.
Why do you think this is so? What are some of your favorite vampire novels? (I <3 Twilight!)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Well, Twilight and New Moon most definitely. As for others, I would have to say The Taste of Night, by R.L. Stine. I thought it was kind of short, but otherwise, I thought it was pretty good. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:15 pm
In literature, every now and then there will be a movement that will resort to past techniques and adapt them. In the same way, sometimes writers resorted to past atmospheres and ideas that they could ressusitate by subjecting them to different styles or by eliminating some rules. Its almost always necessary to use as an influence something to which you feel attracted. Then, eventually, you might be able to turn it into your own by ading individuality to it.
Vampires were not an uncommon theme in the twentieth century. They were repreented in different ways, as vissions started to differ. In some cases, their symbolism was exploited and trasfered to abstract creatures that lacked solidness. Some transformed them to mortal humans but without eliminating their ussual character and their deceiving abilities. You see, they were practically brought to live once people realized that, in a sense, they could really exist. It was not necessary for someone to have teeth to suck the life out of the persons they deceived.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:44 pm
Silver Kiss, Wait for me by Moonlight ( I think that was the title? ), among many others I can't think of. I agree with you though-- vampires have become a very popular subject in books now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:52 pm
MithrandirWeasleyIstari In literature, every now and then there will be a movement that will resort to past techniques and adapt them. In the same way, sometimes writers resorted to past atmospheres and ideas that they could ressusitate by subjecting them to different styles or by eliminating some rules. Its almost always necessary to use as an influence something to which you feel attracted. Then, eventually, you might be able to turn it into your own by ading individuality to it. Vampires were not an uncommon theme in the twentieth century. They were repreented in different ways, as vissions started to differ. In some cases, their symbolism was exploited and trasfered to abstract creatures that lacked solidness. Some transformed them to mortal humans but without eliminating their ussual character and their deceiving abilities. You see, they were practically brought to live once people realized that, in a sense, they could really exist. It was not necessary for someone to have teeth to suck the life out of the persons they deceived. There may have been some novels circling the actual vampire figure in the twentieth century, but I don't think they were as common, or the characters nearly as well developed as today. But the theme of betray and deceitl has always been a common theme in literature, because it's something everyone has undergone. For proof in writing, remember Medea. Her husband who had undergone countless trials with her, who swore to always love her, decided to run off with another young, beautiful woman. To get revenge on her unfaithful husband, she murders her children.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:08 pm
I'm sorry for bringing religion into the answer, but it is a main reason. As many more older members here may know, the Roman Catholic Church is a very powerful figure in the world. In the centuries, it was the law and order of many countries do to the monarch's religion themselves. As most Catholics would say as vampirism came about, it was satanist practices and therefor banned from writing. For centuries it was so, even to the free country of America. Being as the actual truth America was founded do to religious freedoms, especially to the Puritans, it is recently now letting out for the fact of the Catholic and other interests being weakened, also do to the rise of the voice of Muslims, and other religions.
The other thing is Vampirism was founded by Translyvanian Prince Dracula III... as vampirism is a way a live and more of an actual religion, or gaining more power by drinking the blood of your enemies. I do not read much fiction on vampires, but had my over fair share of learning such things of it. I hope this is a plausible answer for you all!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:28 pm
I think a lot of these responses are correct answers to the question. Another idea I would like to point out, that isn't nearly as philosophical or interesting as some of the other responses, but, I believe, equally as true, is the idea of immitation.
People write about what they know. Once one person put out a vampire novel, and then two or three, other people started reading them, and so on and so forth until it just became popular. We don't necessarily COPY what we read, but for many of us, reading others' works is what gives us our ideas. I believe we refer to that as "inspiration". So I think a lot of today's vampire novels were put into the heads of the authors by reading similar works in the past. At least, I'm sure that it happens occassionally.
As for favorite vampire novels, I very much enjoy Laurell K. Hamilton's "Anita Blake" series. They are some of the best novels I've read in a long time. Apart from that, I am also a big fan of Anne Rice's "Interview With the Vampire" and "The Vampire Lestat". She sort of lost me on the third one in the series and I never have finished it. But I believe that those first two were very well done.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:32 pm
I love wrtng about vampires. They're so sexy and mysterious. But, back ontopic my faves would have to Twilight, New Moon, Silver Kiss, and Peeps. They're al so good! I heart vampires!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:40 pm
Well i think the reason people didnt write about vampiers, was cause maybe then thought they were real and that people would find them crazy for writing such nonsens. It could also be b/c of churchers, and if you wrote about those then you were consider to be a witch, vampier or maybe even worship satan. But idk im just throwing out ideas. I really dont read any vampier books, so I dont have a fav. But i did read one i liked, where this girl went in the past to do something. Been so long since i read it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:04 pm
I'm a big fan of vampire stories, and always have been. I don't really know why there has been a sudden surge in vamp books recently. I remember when I was only a lonely 13 year old, looking everywhere for a decent vamp book, and all I could find was one (A very good one by the way, intitled 'The Southern Vampire Series: Dead until Dawn' ) and now it seems every one is writing a vampire story. Some have been good, and some, not so good.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:24 pm
I'm actually not a vampire fan. Though I've never read Stephenie Meyer's works. One day, I will. In fact, I just don't like vampires at all. Why? I guess it's because I don't believe they exist. (B-But it's FICTION, Nishin!) Yes, yes, I know. But I think it's partyl to blame those who obsess over the vampire characters.
I loved James Patterson's Violets are Blue, though. They weren't REALLY vampires. They just THOUGHT they were and went through all means --such as dental surgery-- to become more like a typical vampire. (Not only that, but Kyle Craig goes EVIL. Oooohh, he's smex.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:58 am
Because writers like Oscar Wilde come along and alter the façade of taboo for infinity.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:28 pm
Usually I'm not for any media involving vampires. It tends to be cliche and extremely unoriginal. Of course, with any popular literary genre, there are exceptions, and there are those books that you secretly read into the middle of the night, getting all giddy over the things that you've sworn apathy towards. Personally, Twilight would be the latter. It has all the things that make me groan and wish I could recommend the author take the Mary-Sue Litmus Test, and yet it has something about it that resonates with you. It feels ...real, somehow. The characters stick to you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:13 pm
my first post! woot! ANYWHO. I think it's because everybody started to get the hots for all those smexy vampires out there. You gotta admit, our generation has a thing for romance. and i kinda hate it. not many of them are original, so when a good writer writes about them i feel it was a waste of talent. ohh well.~~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|