|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:06 pm
At Friday, 3/23/07, The Preisdent of Iran Refused to Join the U.N. Conference, since they are about to place sanctions. Due to this, Iran has kidnapped 15 British sailors who were patrolling the Iraqi Seas, and they are refusing to release them, Pissing off the British, also Iran says their Nuclear Program is a "Train with no brakes and Reversing gears". Acting like bullies as i say. This is what we should do, for thier "train", Use Trench diggers and wait for the train to fall into the Trench, and then bury it. Such nerve, don't you all say?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:29 pm
I've heard that one of the British ships ( a non-military one) strayed into Iranian waters and the two British ships were captured after following it. If i turns out they were in Iranian waters does that change anything? No really, Britain and the US are used to always getting their way even if what their men did was criminal. You really so eager to see the record set of the US record being in three wars at once?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:02 pm
Omnileech I've heard that one of the British ships ( a non-military one) strayed into Iranian waters and the two British ships were captured after following it. If i turns out they were in Iranian waters does that change anything? No really, Britain and the US are used to always getting their way even if what their men did was criminal. You really so eager to see the record set of the US record being in three wars at once? Nope, they just need to straighten their attitude, since they are planning to kill the Jewish People (Israel). When you think about it's like when the Germans sank the Lusitania killing around 1000 people plus 198 americans, using the excuse "the Lusitania was carrying Weapons", which was true, but it didn't mean they have kill an extra thousand to do it. How i see it is by their attitude lately, threatening to Nuke Israel & the all that are not Muslim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:19 pm
Demon_Bikou_Gyoku Omnileech I've heard that one of the British ships ( a non-military one) strayed into Iranian waters and the two British ships were captured after following it. If i turns out they were in Iranian waters does that change anything? No really, Britain and the US are used to always getting their way even if what their men did was criminal. You really so eager to see the record set of the US record being in three wars at once? Nope, they just need to straighten their attitude, since they are planning to kill the Jewish People (Israel). When you think about it's like when the Germans sank the Lusitania killing around 1000 people plus 198 americans, using the excuse "the Lusitania was carrying Weapons", which was true, but it didn't mean they have kill an extra thousand to do it. How i see it is by their attitude lately, threatening to Nuke Israel & the all that are not Muslim. israel isn't planning on destroying any countries because that would mean they would be destroyed. They're just pissing Israel off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:26 pm
originaly Iran admitted the Brits were in Iraqi waters which was the same cordinates as the british gave and when some Iranian pionted this out to Mr. Iwantajihad (Amidinijed) He changed the cordinates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:44 pm
Crushin_Russian originaly Iran admitted the Brits were in Iraqi waters which was the same cordinates as the british gave and when some Iranian pionted this out to Mr. Iwantajihad (Amidinijed) He changed the cordinates Evidence please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:07 pm
Omnileech Crushin_Russian originaly Iran admitted the Brits were in Iraqi waters which was the same cordinates as the british gave and when some Iranian pionted this out to Mr. Iwantajihad (Amidinijed) He changed the cordinates Evidence please. let me reword it the Iranians never explicitly said the Brits were in Iraqi waters they gave cordinates which were in Iraq then changed them, and im looking for the Radio transcripts. that being said if the Brits had fired a shot this would have never happened
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:02 pm
Crushin_Russian Omnileech Crushin_Russian originaly Iran admitted the Brits were in Iraqi waters which was the same cordinates as the british gave and when some Iranian pionted this out to Mr. Iwantajihad (Amidinijed) He changed the cordinates Evidence please. let me reword it the Iranians never explicitly said the Brits were in Iraqi waters they gave cordinates which were in Iraq then changed them, and im looking for the Radio transcripts. that being said if the Brits had fired a shot this would have never happened The Iranians captured GPS devices from the British ships that stated where they were 450 meters inside their border or so they say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:47 pm
Omnileech Demon_Bikou_Gyoku Omnileech I've heard that one of the British ships ( a non-military one) strayed into Iranian waters and the two British ships were captured after following it. If i turns out they were in Iranian waters does that change anything? No really, Britain and the US are used to always getting their way even if what their men did was criminal. You really so eager to see the record set of the US record being in three wars at once? Nope, they just need to straighten their attitude, since they are planning to kill the Jewish People (Israel). When you think about it's like when the Germans sank the Lusitania killing around 1000 people plus 198 americans, using the excuse "the Lusitania was carrying Weapons", which was true, but it didn't mean they have kill an extra thousand to do it. How i see it is by their attitude lately, threatening to Nuke Israel & the all that are not Muslim. israel isn't planning on destroying any countries because that would mean they would be destroyed. They're just pissing Israel off. Of course Israel would not attack anyone, they just sit and wait for a Muslim country dumb enough to invade a country as big as San Francisco to Sacromento, since the Jewish People of Israel have vowed to no longer bow down to any forces of Evil (such as the Nazis). Iran on the other hand is provinng they want to kill us Vacaville Newspaper: Reporter ...about 200 angry Iranian youth chanting "Death to Britian" and "Death to America" threw rocks and used Firecrackers at the British Embassy and tried to rush the compound... Also Iran released a clip showing 2 of the sailors and they are saying that it was their territory and they say that it was their fault for tresspassing, the British said it was "Propaganda and an Outrage", Which i believe is the same, i don't think somebody would Kidnap a tresspasser and hold them hostage would they? I don't think a nextdoor neighbor would kidnap a kid because they were tresspassing, unless they neighbor is a rapist? You can see by how Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is acting when George Bush on Saturday Vacaville reporter & George Bush ....Demanded the release of the 15 "hostages". He said they were Innocent and called their capture "Inexcusible behavior" Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called the World Powers "arrogant" for refusing to apologize For my Opinion, i say Mahmoud is being Overzeleaous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:03 pm
I didn't say "attack" I said "destroy" Destroying meaning leveling their country back to the stone age.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:27 pm
Demon_Bikou_Gyoku At Friday, 3/23/07, The Preisdent of Iran Refused to Join the U.N. Conference, since they are about to place sanctions. Due to this, Iran has kidnapped 15 British sailors who were patrolling the Iraqi Seas, and they are refusing to release them, Pissing off the British, also Iran says their Nuclear Program is a "Train with no brakes and Reversing gears". Acting like bullies as i say. This is what we should do, for thier "train", Use Trench diggers and wait for the train to fall into the Trench, and then bury it. Such nerve, don't you all say? As noble as it would be to go after Iran. The western community will not really do anything accept go to the U.N. and ask for sanctions. Not to mention we're not exactly ready to go to war with Iran at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:11 am
Omnileech No really, Britain and the US are used to always getting their way even if what their men did was criminal. That is a weak argument all nations should be held to standards (even our own i don't deny that) and when they fail to meet those standards there should be reprecutions Despite the evidence saying they were in Iraqi water lets just say they were in Iranian water a responsible nation would question them while recognizing that since they border waters of a war zone its possible they accidentally strayed an irresponsible government takes them hostage lets think which one happened in this situation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:54 pm
The victors are rarely held to the standards they set. Otherwise you'd see a lot of Americans on trial for war crimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:44 am
Omnileech The victors are rarely held to the standards they set. Otherwise you'd see a lot of Americans on trial for war crimes. Like who people from Abu-Grab were already tried the administration didn't do anything technically illegal so please expound on your theory, I'm dieing to hear it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:57 am
Scott Ritter Omnileech The victors are rarely held to the standards they set. Otherwise you'd see a lot of Americans on trial for war crimes. Like who people from Abu-Grab were already tried the administration didn't do anything technically illegal so please expound on your theory, I'm dieing to hear it Water boarding isn't illegal? Techniques listed as torture from IGOs aren't illegal? Well, only if the US says they aren't, right? If the US was really beholden to international law then they wouldn't be able to define what is torture and what's not. The use of loud sounds to prevent sleep and disrupt concentration is considered torture yet we're doing that. Beating of prisoners is torture. Malnourishing prisoners is torture. I forget the name but there was a guy who was picked up the US for having a similar name to a known terrorist and he was held for years, I think he was a german citizen on vacation. Anyways he was picked up, sent to a secret prison and then they let him go if he promised not to talk about anything that happened. He did and they dropped him off in some country he had never been in and left on his own to return home. His wife thought he had deserted her and tests on him show he was malnourished. It was in the news about a month or two ago. That'd be something we'd have charges for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
